Insights in enzyme modification for renewable solar hydrogen
Isaac T Yonemoto, Philip Weyman
J. Craig Venter Institute
A Little Bit of Basic Biology
Conventional Biofuels are Steppy
Intercept Electrons at the Source
GOS identified the Alteromonas "Uptake" Hydrogenase
[NiFe] Hydrogenase Features a Complex Organometallic Active Site
Our Studies Focus on the Fe-S Clusters Carrying Electrons to the Active Site
Recap on Fe-S Clusters
Initial Modifications to Hydrogenase Small Subunit
Altermonas Hydrogenase Oxidizes Hydrogen
Can Altermonas Hydrogenase Reduce Proton?
Previous Literature Suggested Amino Acid Substitutions
Species
Substitution
Oxidation Effect
Reduction Effect
D. fructosovorans
Medial Pro to Cys
-38%
+60%[1]
D. fructosovorans
Distal His to Cys
-98.7%
-53%[2]
[1]Rousset, et al. PNAS 1998
[2]Dementin, et al. JACS 2006
Crude Thought Model Suggests a Mechanism
Hydrogen is produced using a simple in vitro assay
Neither Homologous Substitution Improved Activity
Combining Substitutions Improved Activity
How Else Can we Play with Electron Transport?
Can Tweaking the Midpoint Potentials Help?
Literature Precedent for "Strange" Fe-S Clusters
Species
Location
Substitution
M. barkeri
Proximal 1
Cys to Asp
G. metallireducens
Proximal 2
Cys to Asp
N. punctiforme
Proximal 2
Cys to Asn
N. punctiforme
Distal 1
His to Gln
[NiFeSe] hydrogenases
Medial 2
Pro to Cys
[1]Raleiras, et al. JBC 2013
We Screened 48 Substitutions of Fe-S ligating Cysteines
"Native-like" Substitutions are All Functional
Aspartic Acid Substitutions are Generally Well-Tolerated
...And Some of them Outperform the Wild-Type Enzyme
Conclusions and Future Directions
We can make Alteromonas hydrogenase better
We have a library of 48 variants with varying activity
We're working towards understanding why the enzyme has a bias
Hydrogenase may be a good platform for putting Marcus Theory to rigorous test
Acknowledgement
Philip Weyman
Hamilton O Smith
Pin-Ching Maness
Ben Clarkson
Funding
Department of Energy Fuel Cells Office
DE-FG36-05GO15027