More technology is not always the answer - the power of sticky notes



More technology is not always the answer - the power of sticky notes

0 1


hen-2016-sticky-notes

Slides for the talk entitled "More technology is not always the answer – the power of sticky notes", given at the Geological Society of London Higher Education Network Annual Meeting 2016.

On Github ctjacobs / hen-2016-sticky-notes

More technology is not always the answer - the power of sticky notes

Lorraine Craig, Gerard J. Gorman, Christian T. Jacobs Department of Earth Science & Engineering, Imperial College London

Context

  • First-year introductory course on computer programming

  • 80-90 geoscience students each year

  • Taught in computer lab - one 3-hour slot each week

  • Support from Teaching Assistants

  • SOLE feedback received at end of term

  • Our teaching approach has evolved considerably throughout the last 5 years

Previous approaches (2010)

  • Adopted 'traditional' lectures with relatively little time for practical exercises

  • Students positive about lecturing style (what they are used to from A-level)

  • Majority of negative feedback concerned pace and difficulty of material

Previous approaches (2010)

  • Good lecturer and module scores, but poor learning outcomes

  • Programming is a practical skill. Need more practical time

Previous approaches (2011)

  • Introduced an additional (separate) 3-hour practical workshop

  • Significantly more (positive) comments regarding support

  • Relatively high average SOLE score maintained

Previous approaches (2011)

  • Marks improved, likely as a result of more allocated time...

  • ...but approach not sustainable, and pace still too fast

Previous approaches (2012)

  • Moved away from traditional passive classroom environment - YouTube videos introduced

  • Lots of positive feedback regarding pace

    • students work through videos at own pace, and can go back and repeat
  • Mostly negative comments about lecturer & method of delivery ('the lecturer is not lecturing us')

    • students did not feel supported
    • not all students had developed independent learning skills by this point

Previous approaches (2012)

  • No benefit to learning outcomes. Exam marks similar to 2010 mark distribution

  • Lower SOLE score - unfamiliar method of content delivery

Previous approaches (2013)

  • Moved to a flipped classroom environment

    • A type of blended learning - brief lecture to establish context, followed by longer practical session.
  • Positive feedback regarding support, and pace/material.

  • Majority of negative feedback about lecturing style again - not matching student expectations.

Previous approaches (2013)

  • Marks greatly skewed towards positive end of scale

  • But students were not satisfied with flipped classroom - used to traditional passive lecturing

    • "Explained material" criterion had lowest score of -0.06

Current approach

  • Still using blended learning

  • ...but we split up workshop into 'bite-size chunks'

    • Mixing short (10-15 mins) lectures with in-class exercises (30-40 mins)
  • Justified approach to students and emphasise benefits throughout

  • Students felt reassured, resulting in only positive comments regarding lecturing style

Current approach

  • Marks also positively skewed. Most students did very well in meeting learning outcomes in 2014

  • More reassurance and justification behind blended learning approach resulted in improved scores

Some challenges

  • Throughout the workshops we found that...

    a) Students waiting for TAs had to keep hand raised

    b) Feedback only provided via SOLE at end of term

Sticky notes

  • Sticky notes: powerful, versatile, low-tech

  • Frequently used by Software Carpentry organisation

  • Students given one red & one green at start of class

  • Posted on top of student's computer monitor

Green Sticky Notes

  • Posted when student completes a particular exercise.

    • Visual indicator of progress
  • Used to provide positive feedback at end of workshop

Red Sticky Notes

  • Posted if student requires assistance.

    • Alerts the lecturer & TAs
    • Student continue working without keeping hand raised
  • Used to provide negative feedback at end of workshop

Conclusions

  • Sticky notes allowed us to rapidly identify what works and address any problems arising.

  • Students could see that feedback was acted on quickly.

  • Quantity & quality of feedback and pass rate has significantly increased since this technique was introduced.

Resources

More technology is not always the answer - the power of sticky notes Lorraine Craig, Gerard J. Gorman, Christian T. Jacobs Department of Earth Science & Engineering, Imperial College London