Recommendations for broad-scale diversity models from an independent study
Martin Jung
Center for Macroecology, Climate and Evolution
Biodiversity models
Predicted change in species richnes from Newbold et al. (2015)
Potential Problems
- Many broad-scale models generalize over a wide range of variables in a single factor (land use )
- It is tempting to apply those models in a new spatial context
- Based on available ( biased ? ) data
Question :
How well does a broad-scale model reflect species diversity and abundance on a local land-use gradient where local conditions are known?
- Timed point counts
- Total 147 sites: 172 species, 2700 individual counts
Auxiliary data for the comparison
- Remote-sensing and census data (INDVI and meanNDVI, Human population density, Forest-Cover year 2000 )
- Functional traits (Range size, Threat status, Forest specialization )
Summary
- Cropland higher number of species than the average more intense cropland site (Agroforestry)
- More forest-specialists in cropland
- Community differences in plantation forest maybe driven my type (Eucalyptus)
- However: Primary forest likely lower diversity due to size and fragmentation
Conclusion
- Large-scale models succeed at detecting overall impacts of land use change.
- However they might lose accuracy if they are used to predict local impacts on biodiversity, if local conditions do not conform
- Species traits and environmental co-variates could provide a window of opportunity to improve predictions in regions, where coarse categories don´t capture all of the variabilty.
Acknowledgements
- Tim Newbold and Neil Burgess for scientific advice
- PREDICTS contributors for making data available (http://predicts.org.uk)
- The CHIESA project partners for support and coordination
- Everyone at CMEC and UNEP-WCMC
- Danida Fellowship Centre for financial support
Recommendations for broad-scale diversity models from an independent study
Martin Jung
Center for Macroecology, Climate and Evolution